This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)

From: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Steve Ellcey <sellcey at mips dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:53:28 +0200
Subject: Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
References: <661716fd-78f0-4774-ad53-4b2170727aa5@EXCHHUB01.MIPS.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1207101632130.23211@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20120710170826.GE3441@redhat.com><20120710202406.6A6A12C097@topped-with-meat.com>

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:24:06PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:34:50PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > I think those tests could now be considered obsolete and could be removed 
> > > - the requirement for binutils version 2.20 or later means TLS support can 
> > > be assumed to be present.
> > 
> > Shall I file a bug for this removal of TLS configure checks?
> 
> Sounds good.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14349

	Marek

References:
- TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Marek Polacek
- Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]