This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New Polish PO file for 'libc' (version 2.16-pre1)

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: New Polish PO file for 'libc' (version 2.16-pre1)
References: <E1Sl52h-0004N5-8Y@duik.vrijschrift.org><4FF34A44.7020007@suse.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1207031948330.9313@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><4FF34D9B.3010309@suse.com><4FFAEF36.1080203@mentor.com>

> I agree with Joseph here, backporting the .po files is an acceptable and
> trivial backport.

It is right now.  But we must take care not to give the false impression
that this is generically OK for release branches.  It is always fine if and
only if libc.pot has not diverged between the trunk and the branch.


Thanks,
Roland

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Polish PO file for 'libc' (version 2.16-pre1)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Re: New Polish PO file for 'libc' (version 2.16-pre1)
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: New Polish PO file for 'libc' (version 2.16-pre1)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: New Polish PO file for 'libc' (version 2.16-pre1)
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: New Polish PO file for 'libc' (version 2.16-pre1)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]