This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [glibc wiki] Update of "Release/2.16" by AndreasJaeger
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:41:34 +0200
- Subject: Re: [glibc wiki] Update of "Release/2.16" by AndreasJaeger
- References: <20120612121739.3108.25096@sourceware.org> <4FD736D5.5020305@mentor.com>
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 08:32:21 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 6/12/2012 8:17 AM, GLIBC Wiki wrote:
> > Dear Wiki user,
> >
> > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "glibc wiki"
> > for change notification.
> >
> > The "Release/2.16" page has been changed by AndreasJaeger:
> > http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.16?action=diff&rev1=9&rev
> > 2=10>
> > == Machine Status ==
> >
> > * x86, Builds?, No testsuite failures?
> >
> > - * x86_64, Builds?, No testsuite failures?
> > + * x86-64, Builds, No testsuite failures.
> >
> > * x32, Builds?, No testsuite failures?
> > * ARM, Builds?, No testsuite failures?
> > * Power, Builds?, No testsuite failures?
>
> Andreas,
>
> Could you do me a favour and describe the system you built x86-64 on
> without failure?
>
> The "No testesuite failures" condition will vary by test system and in
> retrospect I'd like to capture what test system was used.
I've added now:
(By AJ: Linux 3.4, GCC 4.7, binutils-2.22)
Anything else to add?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126