This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: PATCH: Move sysdeps/x86_64/Implies to sysdeps/x86_64/64
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 18:36:05 -0700
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Move sysdeps/x86_64/Implies to sysdeps/x86_64/64
- References: <20120322175315.GA9938@intel.com><20120322195022.F2EF32C07C@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOriXXrVWVLLuES8OUAXvbcVgcJEAYAgJjHWr3YCB2JmaQ@mail.gmail.com><CAMe9rOru6EXRsoqaBKS0a9fGqwey+52DCak0MwGPM1bzWf29NQ@mail.gmail.com><20120322204013.868A12C086@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOq87mKXdoMOGH=cxiq8C6qhK7bTi5bAB9jQk_Eg7x72Vw@mail.gmail.com><20120322210647.330402C07E@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOpiAWE8U2XFxgavJBi9FUomTZh3XEwcdYN59qNBR8OM7g@mail.gmail.com><20120322211655.C5E992C07E@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOp7AVVWn_Bo6sKC7yRuCaRxiqUXGpLCm9wqvg2aSjHx-Q@mail.gmail.com><20120322220155.1AC112C07E@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOqj3J=fw984tRMG-FTgxgxbKbjRZJzrnoaOfqzAi815+g@mail.gmail.com><20120322222523.5F52A2C08D@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOqqKB0g_0xoueMWX-902eOeFqpw3LmO7Ej6p=xERjWtCQ@mail.gmail.com><20120406210447.642DE2C0C4@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOo1gPRVRqhTwYjwdhKWyTgn2-aJMsLnHw7ZYZjPDnGiJw@mail.gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1204071511060.12109@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><CAMe9rOp_F85X-XJ4Jp-_AU1D_cDdZwEdMNMfKDsk4WgmtSWByg@mail.gmail.com><20120509225420.D0FD12C0A7@topped-with-meat.com>
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> The new branch roland/implies-before-after has a configure change to allow
> both Implies-before and Implies-after files with what I think were the
> semantics you wanted them to have. ?(It's only trivially different from the
> patch I previously posted for just Implies-after.)
>
> I'm certainly not happy with that as a solution, but I don't think we can
> reasonably expect to manage anything requiring more deep thinking in the
> time we want to get x32 merged in. ?(It will be all I can do just to do an
> adequate review on all your patches in the next week or three.)
>
> If that is sufficient for you to get things working adequately for x32,
> then I think we should go with this change for now, even though it's ugly
> and only confuses the situation in general terms. ?(But nobody else should
> start using Implies-{before,after} files.)
>
It works for x32.
Thanks.
--
H.J.