This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 19 April 2012 12:18:36 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > My view of when glibc's own documentation (not that in a separate project) > should be updated by a patch is: it is desirable for all public interfaces > in glibc to be documented in the glibc manual. This should be considered > required for all new functions that do not come from a standard such as > ISO C or POSIX, and are not just direct wrappers round system calls, > unless they form part of a group with existing functions none of which are > documented. Even in those cases (functions from external standards, > direct wrappers round system calls, and functions from existing > undocumented groups of functions), documentation is still desirable (but I > don't want to require it to be added in order to add the function). +1 -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |