This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix up LD_* vars behaviour

From: ams at gnu dot org (Alfred M. Szmidt)
To: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
Cc: carlos_odonell at mentor dot com, joseph at codesourcery dot com,mtk dot manpages at gmail dot com, roland at hack dot frob dot com,polacek at redhat dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:38:04 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix up LD_* vars behaviour
References: <20120419.193038.916441651990651697.davem@davemloft.net><4F995BBC.9090900@mentor.com><E1SNReV-0003qO-DS@fencepost.gnu.org> <20120426.152812.1169485217951825257.davem@davemloft.net>
Reply-to: ams at gnu dot org

   > (the man-pages project doesn't document many many aspects of glibc).

   This side-steps the main point, which is that the man-pages project
   documents more apsects of glibc than glibc's own documentation.  And
   that it is the primary resource for programmers writing code against
   glibc.

That may be so, but arguing what documents more or less won't help
improving the offical documentation.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix up LD_* vars behaviour
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Fix up LD_* vars behaviour
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Fix up LD_* vars behaviour
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: [PATCH] Fix up LD_* vars behaviour
  - From: David Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]