This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sysdeps/.../elf

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
To: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
Cc: roland at hack dot frob dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:16:14 -0400
Subject: Re: sysdeps/.../elf
References: <20120316231107.60DE22C0D1@topped-with-meat.com><20120316.161444.1574095451382220627.davem@davemloft.net>

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:14 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> Since we've now dropped all pretense of non-ELF configurations being
>> supported, it seems to me we should dispense with all the elf/
>> subdirectories under sysdeps. ?That is, move their contents up to
>> the containing directory. ?I don't think this will actually change
>> anything, but I haven't made a thorough study.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> I don't see any problems with doing this.
>

Seems fine to me.

I count ~62 files between libc and ports that would be moved.

At a first look none of them seem to be anything special.

Cheers,
Carlos.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sysdeps/.../elf
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- sysdeps/.../elf
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: sysdeps/.../elf
  - From: David Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]