This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 11:19:33 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
References: <20120315192515.GA6585@intel.com><20120315195000.7E3BE2C0A3@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOpXRcO6a4cFEU=s1Gjzzt87zvyzuLhAWupc2pOX6az6ig@mail.gmail.com><20120315232954.52CB42C0BB@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOot6kFbuGWUXapVmaLO31TAuw39uvQ=D0Jj=aW3o1ve1g@mail.gmail.com><20120316225833.72A1B2C0D1@topped-with-meat.com>

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> It wasn't entirely clear to me that we'd resolved the question of tv_nsec
> ever not being 'long int'. ?But this change itself doesn't ever define
> __snseconds_t to anything but that, so it is not a problem so far.
>
>

Is this OK to install then?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]