This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:16:23 +0000, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > That makes it powerpc, s390 and sh we haven't heard from the maintainers
> > of. I've CC:ed those maintainers; could you comment on whether requiring
> > binutils 2.20 or later is OK for your architecture?
>
> OK for SH (unless Kaz puts in a veto); I'm currently testing with
> something 2.21-ish as well as CVS HEAD.
Kaz, do you have any comments on this version requirement? Unless you
have any problems with it, I think we have assent from maintainers for all
libc architectures with listed maintainers (and implicit assent for x86_64
since that already requires 2.20 in practice) and so I think we're ready
for me to commit this change.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com