This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:09:38 -0500
Subject: Re: Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc
Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of patofiero@gmail.com designates 10.236.77.102 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=patofiero@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=patofiero@gmail.com
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1202242216420.2811@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20120224230247.D0DF92C0A1@topped-with-meat.com><CADZpyixi8hYJyUGZ8E==yMsMYJ9KzKTNNttGPDccSS5WXA2C3w@mail.gmail.com><20120224235815.9032C2C0A1@topped-with-meat.com>

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> For HPPA we want the absolute newest binutils possible since we have
>> some cache aliasing issues which are fixed by newer binutils.
>
> sysdeps/.../configure files can and should have more stringent requirements
> if they are necessary for that configuration to work.

Agreed. I was only weighing in as your requested.

Cheers,
Carlos.

References:
- Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]