This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Require GCC 4.3 or later to build glibc

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:49:12 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Require GCC 4.3 or later to build glibc
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1202232058250.26967@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><CADZpyixi08UoGBH1CzM=MRBnhfyJXZw+p4JfzKVJn3YNZFXs7A@mail.gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1202241732150.31204@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20120224173706.F170C2C0A6@topped-with-meat.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1202241738170.31204@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

> * When I checked in a change with such an entry, it was shortly thereafter 
> followed by:
> 
> commit 6c1eace5df647ea85c7472c3fb314665abb22ec1
> Author: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>
> Date:   Mon Jan 30 22:50:20 2012 -0500
> 
>     Don't add CL for generated files!!!

There was no discussion about changing the well-established convention.
I don't think it should change, unless we do some form of automation that
ensures that you can never get a commit in without having the regeneration
done implicitly.


Thanks,
Roland

References:
- Require GCC 4.3 or later to build glibc
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Require GCC 4.3 or later to build glibc
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: Require GCC 4.3 or later to build glibc
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Require GCC 4.3 or later to build glibc
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Require GCC 4.3 or later to build glibc
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]