This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Saturday 18 February 2012 16:44:41 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I don't think this is a good practice; build bugs are bugs much like other > bugs, which may be valid or user error and may or may not have sufficient > information when first reported; they should be treated like other bugs. i agree completely > It probably makes sense to have a new component "build" for problems > building glibc or reports that it's completely broken in a particular > configuration. For failures of particular testcases in the testsuite, I > think existing components such as "libc" and "ports" are more appropriate. sounds reasonable -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |