This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Proposal for STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_*_IRELATIVE
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- To: Rod dot Evans at sun dot com
- Cc: generic-abi at googlegroups dot com, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, discuss at x86-64 dot org, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, IA32 System V Application Binary Interface <ia32-abi at googlegroups dot com>, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:41:48 -0700
- Subject: Re: Proposal for STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_*_IRELATIVE
- References: <6dc9ffc80905251156p1ab274aey8e52be086fd88749@mail.gmail.com> <4A1C1B68.10805@sun.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rod Evans wrote:
> Late last year there was a discussion in regards STT_IFUNC, and we
> thought you'd settled on this name (no _GNU_) and the associated
> value of 7.
No. Because _you_ said you don't want this we settled on an OS-specific
value and name.
> I assume we should now remove this dead-wood and reserve the STT_LOOS
> value instead.
Why reserve it? It's OS-specific. Nobody will crowd that range but you
and if you should use it and it's a different value, then it doesn't
matter either.
- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkocKdwACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHRRWwCfbSofNRTx5qCs4fm+LC6xUQvQ
LFIAoKFxCU72dVRRV1TqH+86lyKKknDK
=MtoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----