This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: the ports repository is dead, long live the ports repository
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libc-ports at sources dot redhat dot com, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:25:02 -0400
- Subject: Re: the ports repository is dead, long live the ports repository
- References: <20090430205216.7E43EFC3BF@magilla.sf.frob.com>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
> I have disabled any further CVS commits to libc-ports in the ACL.
> (If you have shell access on sourceware, you can still do all manner of things.)
>
> The GIT repository is now the standard authoritative repository:
>
> ? ? ? ?URL: git://sourceware.org/git/glibc-ports.git
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ssh://sourceware.org/git/glibc-ports.git
>
> Do not make any new tags or branches in GIT before consulting here.
>
> If you have been doing CVS commits to your ports without anyone else's
> approval, then you can use "git push" on the "master" branch with commits
> that touch only your own port's files. ?Otherwise, consult here first.
>
> Somebody please update the wiki.
I'm updating the wiki, sourcware, and fsf websites.
Are the git web features enabled?
1. We use cvsweb to point people at the latest copy of the checked in FAQ.
2. We allow people to browse the repository with cvsweb.
Cheers,
Carlos.