This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > I thought of doing this. Currently __check_pf() is called once for each > getaddrinfo() call before we get the list of destination addresses. > The new RTM_GETROUTE call needs to be done after we get the destination > address list and once for each dest. address. And? Why should this be a problem with reusing the socket? It's a lame excuse for not wanting to do the work. > Are you suggesting using the same socket for RTM_GETROUTE and > SIOCGHWADDR calls. No, I did not. I suggest, though, to use the same socket for all necessary SIOCGHWADDR calls. > Can we do a SIOCGHWADDR ioctl on a netlink socket? I don't know. I didn't suggest using the ioctl. > I am not fully familiar with the glibc coding standards, but i tried to > follow the syntax of the existing code as much as possible. Then you did an extremely poor job. Most lines you didn't copy from somewhere are wrong. > I think it will be much easier for you to make these changes to fix this > issue and treat this as a bug report with a suggested solution. Then say from the beginning that you're not interested in fixing the problem and have me waste time by explaining them. -- â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |