Re: getconf default output

[Josh Aas <josha at sgi dot com>]

I would be happy to submit a patch that uses either the current 
directory or known parameters. I think the latter seems like a better 
idea, but whichever you think is better I will do. Thanks for your 
responses. Note:

"If no operands are specified then all known variables are written in 
name=value form to the standard output, one per line. Only one of 
--call, --name or --standard may be specified."

Found at: http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/man/man1/getconf.html

Somebody must be doing that.

-Josh

Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Roland McGrath wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Sure, send a patch to implement it.
> >
> > No, it makes no sense.  You cannot print pathconf information without a
> > path.  And the spec is clear that a parameter is required.
>
>
> I thought the suggestion was to give a way to list the known parameter names.

--
Josh Aas
Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI)
Linux System Software
651-683-3068