This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: AC_FD_MSG macros undefined

From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams at kemisten dot nu>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: rra at stanford dot edu, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:55:41 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: AC_FD_MSG macros undefined
References: <200402292129.i1TLTL0L019093@magilla.sf.frob.com><200403010823.i218NPNS025079@ringbrynjan.it.uu.se><87oerg1h9i.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu><200403021431.i22EVQxE019102@spjutet.it.uu.se> <jeznazl35t.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

   This is all the discussion is about.  The configure fragments must
   all be generated by the same autoconf version, since they are
   *fragments*, not standalone scripts.

As I said, that isn't what the disucssion is about, I am talking about
standalone script.  [libc]/sysdeps/i386/elf/configure.in being
generated with autoconf 2.2x and [libc]/configure.in being generated
with autoconf 2.1x.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AC_FD_MSG macros undefined
  - From: Andreas Schwab

References:
- Re: AC_FD_MSG macros undefined
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: AC_FD_MSG macros undefined
  - From: Russ Allbery
- Re: AC_FD_MSG macros undefined
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: AC_FD_MSG macros undefined
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]