This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [Patch] ldd failures on multilb architectures
- From: "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse dot de>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:59:09 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Patch] ldd failures on multilb architectures
> Say on s390x (looking at your signature):
> echo 'int main () { return 0; }' > test.c
> for i in -m31 -m64; do for j in "" -static; do gcc $i $j -o test test.c;
ldd ./test; echo $?; done; done
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4002d000)
> /lib/ld.so.1 => /lib/ld.so.1 (0x40000000)
> 0
> not a dynamic executable
> 1
> libc.so.6 => /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0000010000031000)
> /lib64/ld64.so.1 => /lib64/ld64.so.1 (0x0000010000000000)
> 0
> not a dynamic executable
> 1
Same here. Works fine. Must be something in the SuSE glibc rpm.
blue skies,
Martin