This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] linuxthreads for hppa (1/3)
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at baldric dot uwo dot ca>
- To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>,parisc-linux at lists dot parisc-linux dot org
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:40:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] linuxthreads for hppa (1/3)
- References: <20031010204444.GF6454@systemhalted> <3F8CD774.4040400@redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:13:24PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
> I think I've asked this before:
>
> > Use __LT_INITIALIZER_NOT_ZERO instead of __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT.
>
> Why? No unnecessary changes.
__LT_SPINLOCK_INIT is the value of the structure and used for
initialization e.g. { 1, 1, 1, 1 }. It can no longer be used in a macro
evaluation like "#if __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT". Instead the other macros was
added.
> No unnecessary changes. Leave the code you're not using alone.
> And again.
I made the mistake of adding my STACK_GROWS_UP fixes to this patch set.
If you note I have submitted a "Round 2" set of patches that remove
these changes.
Cheeers,
Carlos.