This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sh4 fails on check-textrel in glibc-2.3.2 even though there areno relocations?

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:33:38 -0700
Subject: Re: sh4 fails on check-textrel in glibc-2.3.2 even though there areno relocations?
References: <200307312105.h6VL5NY23362@magilla.sf.frob.com> <3F299822.4050109@kegel.com>

Dan Kegel wrote:

Roland McGrath wrote:
check-textrel still fails.  Oddly, when you use readelf -a to look
at the .so's that supposedly have relocations, there aren't any,
but there is a size-zero TEXTREL:
That sounds like an ld bug. DT_TEXTREL set by ld -shared when it thinks there were some dynamic relocs in read-only segments.
Kai sent me a test patch for binutils,


I meant Kaz, of course.  D'oh.
- Dan


--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045

References:
- Re: sh4 fails on check-textrel in glibc-2.3.2 even though there are norelocations?
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: sh4 fails on check-textrel in glibc-2.3.2 even though there areno relocations?
  - From: Dan Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]