This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: gcc 3.2 needed for everything?
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 10:22:57PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Earlier gcc versions have more bugs and we don't recommend using
> them. But as far as I know nothing prevents it. However, you
> should be aware that there has been little testing at best of using
> older compilers with glibc-2.3 headers installed.
We have a success report of someone building X with gcc-2.95 and
learning from failures is nice in theory...
but in practice, it sucks :)
- Wolfgang Jaehrling