This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] ppc64 utmp changes
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:28:07PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I would prefer to define __timeval32 (or __timeval_32t) since there are at
> > least two places (structs utmp and utmpx) that need it.
> > But it also seems to work with the following in utmp/utmpx:
> Let's do the anonymous struct for now.
Now an important question is whether we want to do something similar
on x86-64, s390/s390x and sparc/sparc64.
Because when both 32-bit and 64-bit programs will use utmp/utmpx,
the files will contain garbage.