This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Small fix for Linux __opensock
> There is a good reason for the current order but I cannot remember
> right now. I'll have to think more about it.
It's certainly possible that the current order in __opensock has other
advantages. Let me know and I will try to come up with a more
specific workaround for if_nameindex(), since I doubt that we can get
unix_ioctl() in Linux-2.2 and earlier changed.