This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Fwd: Re: C++ and pthread_create()

Thanks a LOT for sharing your opinions/plans/whatever! ;-)

Perhaps you should read this:

"...I think any implementation that doesn't build
 cancelation (and thread exit) on top of a pervasive 
 common exception infrastructure is broken to the point 
 of being unusable. Nevertheless, the standard doesn't 
 (and can't) require a correct implementation, so those 
 who do it wrong can get away with it as long as their
 users allow them to. ..."


Oh, Ah... P.S. Drepper, do you still need/want to 
kill Stallman and associates? IF that could help
with the SUBJECT... we might arrange something 
with my Russian friends. ;-) ;-)

---- schrieb am 12.02.02:
> G'Day,
> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> > 
> > In article, Alexander
> > Terekhov wrote:
> > > (Kaz Kylheku) wrote in message news:BFA98.8029$
> > >"P.S. Kaz, are there any chances/plans that you or some
> > > other linux*threads* developer/maintainer would address
> > > the issue of thread-cancellation/thread-exit
> > > (pthread_exit) and *C++*-stack-unwinding? ;-)"
> > 
> > You really should direct that to the libc-alpha mailing list. I'd love to
> > work on this, but guys like Drepper may have some plans in that regard.
> > My feeling is that this is a sensitive thing, because it leads to fragile
> > integration between the GCC and Glibc projects. I don't know where the two
> > groups stand on the issue of settling on an exception handling interface.
> regards,
> alexander.

Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr! 
Beim WEB.DE Lottoservice:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]