This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Allowing multiple threads packages, a new threads package
Ulrich Drepper <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> email@example.com writes:
> > I still don't understand. If you can't change any code generated,
> > then you can't change much in glibc.
> Of course you can. This must in any case be a compile-time option.
> Any alternative thread package will have to provide its own set of
> headers. If you dream about a binary-drop-in replacement dream on.
I was being a little facetious here, if you can't change one byte in
the libc library object, you can't change much in it.
I agree that any change like this cannot change anything outside the
library, and I don't believe it will, with the exception of libio
which will continue to work properly.
And I don't think I'm dreaming of binary replacement, I had over 30
systems with around 100 software developers working on it using this
patch, with several different compiler versions (compiled before and
after the patch), doing c++ and gcj development on linuxthreads and
another threads package and it works fine, it's fully backwards and