This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: New attribute "infrequent"?
- To: drepper at cygnus dot com, jh at suse dot cz
- Subject: Re: New attribute "infrequent"?
- From: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: aj at suse dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, pfk at fuchs dot offl dot uni-jena dot de
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:47:06 +0200
> From: Jan Hubicka <email@example.com>
> To: Ulrich Drepper <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Actually for enabling -Os, the attribute "infrequent" looks like
> better choice to me:
If 80% of the code is executed 10% of the time, does it make any sense
to have people mark up the 80% of the code as infrequent? Or put
another way, would it not make more sense to have the mark the
frequent code instead?
Just wanna make sure we solve the right problem...