This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: malloc patch for 2.2.4


> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:08:05 +0200 (MDT)
> From: Wolfram Gloger <Wolfram.Gloger@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de>

> > I wasn't here talking about what ISO requires---as you say, threads
> > are not dealt with by the C standard.  I was saying what the compiler
> > will actually do.
> 
> Actually do?  I've tested and found that gcc-2.95 generates _exactly
> the same code_ for malloc.o with or without the patch below applied,
> at least with -O and -O2.  I wouldn't have expected otherwise..

By "actually do", I was including all the possible cases in which this
code could be presented, not just that of malloc.o.  That is, I know
of a code path in GCC that can do this.

It's nice that the same code is generated, this means you aren't
losing much in terms of performance.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]