This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Subject: Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 15:59:51 -0700
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <20010630110153.C432@stanford.edu> <3B3E4772.D06B00D2@unitus.it>
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 11:41:06PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> No. It's time for you, the developers, to discuss technical solutions to the
> problem.
>
Well, like I said, the gcc developers have to ACKNOWLEDGE there is a
problem first.
BTW, I, and other glibc developers, can provide patches to gcc and
glibc. But they have to be acceptable to both gcc and glibc developers.
If the gcc developers won't even admit there is a serious problem, do
you think those gcc patches will be considered?
H.J.