This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.

To: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp at gzp dot org dot hu>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:35:02 -0800
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20010318223003.A1333@gzp2.gzp.hu> <20010318133852.A25902@lucon.org> <20010318224501.A1094@gzp2.gzp.hu> <20010318164100.A13028@lucon.org> <20010318164805.A22420@lucon.org> <20010319081756.A323@gzp2.gzp.hu> <20010319084021.A11139@lucon.org> <20010319182407.F295@gzp2.gzp.hu> <20010319092739.A11922@lucon.org> <20010319183344.H295@gzp2.gzp.hu>

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 06:33:44PM +0100, Gabor Z. Papp wrote:
> * "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>:
> 
> | The "bogus" libgcc_s.so.0 comes from gcc in CVS. I am not sure if
> | gcc 2.95.3 has it. Do
> 
> I compiled glibc with 2.95.3 and several apps ask for it.
> Those apps where not recompiled since the glibc upgrade, so
> I'm sure it comes from the glibc. One of such apps is
> Gnome's PANEL, and I'm 1000% sure that I not compiled gnome
> nowadays.
> 

You have to recompile any binaries which ask for libgcc_s.so.0.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
  - From: Gabor Z. Papp

References:
- glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
  - From: Gabor Z. Papp
- Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
  - From: Gabor Z. Papp

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]