This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: GCC 2.95.2 and GLIBC 2.1.93, broken streambuf.h
Rod Stewart <stewart@lab43.org> writes in libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com:
...
> The mainline CVS is the head (weekly snapshots) of the CVS tree.
O.K.
I am using this:
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-pc-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 20000828 (experimental)
as the main compiler. I haven't been taking direct CVS snapshots
(like I'm doing with glibc) because the weekly tarballs come out fast
enough for me. I did indeed get gcc-2.95.2 and egcs-1.1.2 to compile
with glibc-2.2 installed by backporting the changes I found there.
I am now very confused. What did Ulrich mean when he asked me to use
a different compiler? The gcc-2.96 branch is not particularly stable
so I thought he meant to use one of the other branches.