This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

glibc %I printf flag


glibc supports an undocumented 'I' flag on printf formats.

(a) Given that it is undocumented, is it a feature that is going to stay
around?

(b) In what locales does this make any difference to the output?

(c) Does it make sense to make GCC's format checking recognise it?

(d) If the answer to (c) is yes, then are decimal integer formats (%d, %i,
%u) to only ones to accept it on, and should the oddity that glibc also
accepts it after width or precision, unlike other flags, be followed by
GCC?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]