This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE
- To: Bruno Haible <haible at ilog dot fr>
- Subject: Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE
- From: Akim Demaille <akim at epita dot fr>
- Date: 01 Aug 2000 19:43:51 +0200
- Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert at twinsun dot com>, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, autoconf at gnu dot org
- References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0007261506580.6571-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk><m3lmyoamkf.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com><200007262030.NAA15438@ruby.twinsun.com><14719.22225.713527.823418@honolulu.ilog.fr><mv4vgxrx6ki.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><200007271634.JAA08859@green-office.twinsun.com><mv4n1iymwrq.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><14725.40424.405013.773855@honolulu.ilog.fr><mv466pme1pc.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><200007312139.OAA01047@ruby.twinsun.com><mv43dkpnk3p.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><14726.57585.66730.177665@honolulu.ilog.fr>
>>>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> writes:
Bruno> Akim Demaille writes:
>> +AH_TEMPLATE([_HPUX_SOURCE], + [FIXME: what's the
>> documentation?])dnl
Bruno> Well, as Paul Eggert said, it is preferrable to try to append
Bruno> "-Ae" to $CC (and $CPP) instead of defining _HPUX_SOURCE. "cc
Bruno> -Ae" gives you "long long" support, which _HPUX_SOURCE doesn't.
Yep, maybe, but I fear it is somewhat different: does it mean you're
requiring ANSI C? If it does not, then fine with me.
If it does, I'm in favor of delaying all this until 2.51.
We *need* to ship 2.50. Afterwards, we can have more regular
releases, and we will.