This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
glibc-2.0.95 and ndbm.h?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: glibc-2.0.95 and ndbm.h?
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirlemail@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 12:29:19 +0200
during recompilation of all RedHat packages some failed because no ndbm.h
get's installed. Is this the desired behaviour? Since libndbm gets
installed as a link to libdb2 in db2/Makefile, wouldn't it be useful to
install ndbm.h too? I have verified that installation of db/ndbm.h in
/usr/include solves the compilation problems.
What is the glibc policy here? Correct the package or correct the ndbm