This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: 1.3.6?

To: Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj at mdj dot nada dot kth dot se>
Subject: Re: 1.3.6?
From: "Greg J. Badros" <gjb at cs dot washington dot edu>
Date: 10 Mar 2000 08:39:45 -0800
Cc: Valentin Kamyshenko <val at kamysh dot materials dot kiev dot ua>, mstachow at alum dot mit dot edu, guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, djurfeldt at nada dot kth dot se
References: <m266uv4mq8.fsf@kamysh.materials.kiev.ua> <xy7u2ifm5as.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se> <qrr7lfabypk.fsf@clavicle.cs.washington.edu> <xy7em9i7qc3.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se>

Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:

> "Greg J. Badros" <gjb@cs.washington.edu> writes:
> 
> > Also, I'll re-suggest that we do two-branch development.
> 
> I understand the advantages of two-branch development, and don't have
> any strong objections, but I do think that we consistently should try
> to keep things simple, on all fronts.  Two-branch development would
> introduce complexity into the development process, so we should take
> this step only when we see that it is necessary.

I'm not dead-set on this, and am having second thoughts; as long as
things keep moving along nicely in a single branch, it may be better to
maintain the one branch to maximize our developer resources.

Thanks,
Greg

References:
- 1.3.6?
  - From: Valentin Kamyshenko
- Re: 1.3.6?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: 1.3.6?
  - From: Greg J. Badros
- Re: 1.3.6?
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]