This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
mcmanr@eq.gs.com writes: > Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@nada.kth.se> writes: > > > Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@nada.kth.se> writes: > > > > Jim suggested the name `(scheme-repl)' instead on the basis that a lot > > of bindings will be useful only in a repl context. If no-one has > > other ideas, I'll change `(user)' to `(scheme-repl)'. > > I use lots of the bindings in ice-9/slib.scm even in embedded applications. > Besides, common lisp has CL-USER! > I agree that scheme-repl is a bad name, as it will be the package that users are placed in even in apps that don't have a repl. I'd recommend (guile-user) on analogy with CL, or just stick with (user). - Maciej Stachowiak