Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox@gmail.com>
• Re: Reducing code size of Position Independent Executables (PIE) by shrinking the size of dynamic relocations section
  • From: "Sriraman Tallam via gnu-gabi" <gnu-gabi@sourceware.org>
• gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: hpa@zytor.com
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox@gmail.com>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: "James Y Knight via gnu-gabi" <gnu-gabi@sourceware.org>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com>
• Reserving a section type range for LLVM
  • From: "Peter Collingbourne via gnu-gabi" <gnu-gabi@sourceware.org>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox@gmail.com>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
• Re: gABI extension proposal: PT_SHMMAP
  • From: Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox@gmail.com>
• Re: Reserving a section type range for LLVM
  • From: "Peter Collingbourne via gnu-gabi" <gnu-gabi@sourceware.org>
• Re: Reserving a section type range for LLVM
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• Re: Reserving a section type range for LLVM
  • From: "Peter Collingbourne via gnu-gabi" <gnu-gabi@sourceware.org>
• Re: Reserving a section type range for LLVM
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• RFC: Update x86 psABIs to support IBT
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• Document .note.gnu.property and NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• Re: RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
• Re: RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• Re: RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
• Re: RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
• RE: RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: "Shanbhogue, Vedvyas" <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>
• Re: RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
• Re: RFC: Update x86 psABI to support shadow stac
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>