This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb ignoring vCont supported commands
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:12 PM Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/09/2018 09:29 PM, Bill Morgan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2018-10-09 16:12, Bill Morgan wrote:
> >>> I get a warning that vContSupported is unrecognized:
> >>>
> >>> Sending packet:
> >>>
> >>
> $qSupported:multiprocess+;swbreak+;hwbreak+;qRelocInsn+;fork-events+;vfork-events+;exec-events+;vContSupported+;QThreadEvents+;no-resumed+#df...Ack
> >>> Packet received:
> >>>
> >>
> PacketSize=3fff;QPassSignals+;qXfer:features:read+;qXfer:threads:read+;vContSupported
> >>> Packet qSupported (supported-packets) is supported
> >>> warning: unrecognized item "vContSupported" in "qSupported" response
> >>
> >> I believe you are missing the + after vContSupported.
> >>
> >> You are correct, I was missing the +. Thank you.
> >
> > So it is now recognizing the vContSupported, but it is still sending
> > vCont;s
> >
>
> Argh, I forgot that this only really works on ARM GNU/Linux.
> What is your target?
>
Custom OS on ARM.
This is what I'm reporting to GDB:
Sending packet: $qXfer:features:read:target.xml:0,fff#7d...Ack
Packet received: l<target><architecture>arm</architecture></target>
>
> We're missing the small infrastructure change in GDB
> mentioned in the discussion I linked before.
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>