This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ?

From: John Gilmore <gnu at toad dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, brobecker at adacore dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:40:11 -0800
Subject: Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
References: <50A13A4E.3020000@redhat.com> <20121113162530.GX4847@adacore.com> <201211131640.qADGeKhs021376@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <50A281BC.9030802@redhat.com>

>>>>   [Thread 0x7ffff7fd0740 (LWP 12019) "sigstep-threads"] #1 received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
>   Thread 2 received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.

GDB shouldn't mention threads at all, unless the program being debugged
is multi-threaded.

	John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Time to expand "Program received signal" ?
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]