This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GIT and CVS
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Pedro Larroy <pedro dot larroy dot lists at gmail dot com>
- Cc: pmuldoon at redhat dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:02:24 -0700
- Subject: Re: GIT and CVS
- References: <m3sjmwn0nh.fsf@redhat.com> <CAC_CU1gLJaqM5uPU0P1b5hj-wBxouveJHHfc_hhCxDORFZGYcw@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com> writes:
Pedro> Why not mercurial? it's more user friendly than git, and better cross
Pedro> platform support.
To answer your question, most active gdb developers are already using
git and just use CVS for the final commit.
But let's end this thread. We've had this discussion several times now
and haven't learned anything new since (see point 6):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-03/msg00486.html
The problem has been the lack of manpower, and perhaps willpower, to do
the actual work.
Tom