Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : <phase_2_complete>

[Petr HluzÃn <petr dot hluzin at gmail dot com>]

On 2 May 2011 16:46, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Petr" == Petr HluzÃn <petr.hluzin@gmail.com> writes:
> Petr> I also recommend to define a local variable in the smalles scope
> Petr> possible, however I understand that many
> Petr> programmers use weak tools and knowing its definition requires more
> Petr> effort than placing cursor on the variable - therefore they prefer
> Petr> definitions at the start of function.
>
> I agree, using the smallest scope is generally preferable.
> This practice makes it simpler to reason about the code.
>
> Petr> My IDE has a spellchecker which underlines typos. No effort required.
> Petr> (Consider upgrading your tools.)
>
> I'm curious to know what IDE you use for working on GDB.

The spell-checking and highlighting/displaying variable's definition
(plus many other goodies) is done by "Visual Assist X" extension to
Visual Studio. The initialization by 0xCCCCCCCC is done by VS compiler
and C runtime. VS can be configured to use an external compiler; of
course you loose some perks.

I am still searching for a comfortable cross-platform IDE.

I investigated the patch because I am interested reversible debugging.
However I barely work on GDB. I would be mostly interested in
polishing, removing rough corners and making tiny things work right.
But I feel that real hackers here do not like making tools nice to
use; or making things work for those who are not already experts; for
people who expect their tools to know their job without requiring
user's supervision, etc.

> Petr> GDB commiters: please reply whether you agree with my review. (So that
> Petr> paawan oza does not spend effort in vain.)
>
> I thought it was quite good. ÂThanks for doing this.

Thanks for feedback.

-- 
Petr Hluzin