This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:09:39 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:"Jan" == Jan Kratochvil<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> The question is if we say this GCC is broken (and XFAIL it or move it to Jan> gdb.dwarf2/) or whether GDB should use SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS.
Jan> I am for the latter, DWARF talks for DW_TAG_label about Jan> DW_AT_low_pc and not about DW_AT_decl_line.
Yes, I also think that makes sense.
Just it will not work on reload of the executable changed underneath where PCs change as EXPLICIT_PC needs to be in charge.
But it already does not work now for `run':
Thanks, -- Edjunior
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |