This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: CORE_ADDR representation
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com> writes:
>> I would say to declare that CORE_ADDR is fundamentally 0..memtop, so
>> it should be unsigned and zero-extend.
>> Can unsigned->signed->diddle->unsigned be encapsulated for MIPS only?
Daniel> I don't know that it can't. I think I discussed this with
Daniel> Andrew many years ago, and he thought that it couldn't; but I
Daniel> can't find the details...
Maybe this thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2002-09/threads.html#00078