This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...
> | sym_arr[i1] = lookup_symbol_in_language (phys_name,
> | NULL, FUNCTIONS_DOMAIN,
> | language,
> | (int *) NULL);
> | - if (sym_arr[i1])
> | + /* See PR10966. Remove check on symbol domain and class when
> | + we stop using (bad) linkage names on constructors. */
> | + if (sym_arr[i1] && (SYMBOL_DOMAIN (sym_arr[i1]) == VAR_DOMAIN
> | + && SYMBOL_CLASS (sym_arr[i1]) == LOC_BLOCK))
> | i1++;
Tested with no regression on my end. Regarding my C++ compiler quality,
I looked at gdb.sum, and I have 32 KFAILs and 20 FAILs in gdb.cp.
However, upon further testing, it appears that the patches does not
have the desired effect (or I applied it at the wrong location?):
(gdb) b Foo::Foo
the class Foo does not have any method named Foo
Hint: try 'Foo::Foo<TAB> or 'Foo::Foo<ESC-?>
(Note leading single quote.)
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n