This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: gdb reverse execution: how to actually run tests for it?
> Pedro> For the generic reverse execution tests --- reverse step, reverse
> Pedro> next, reverse continue, run to breakpoint in reverse, etc., etc.,
> Pedro> I'd must prefer that we would get rid of the need for board files
> Pedro> at all. :-)
> Pedro> 1. for native targets, the only reverse solution we currently support
> Pedro> precord. I can't see why we can't default to testing the reverse
> Pedro> with precord then.
> I agree.
> If the tests aren't enabled by default on some common platforms and thus
> run as a regular part of testing, you can be sure there will be
> regressions here.
So the question here is: who will deal with removing the board file dependency?
I don't think we and our consultants doing the work for us are competent
So is it OK if we submit a kit of tests which are structured in the same way as
the current reverse tests? Then we can deal with upgrading the tests later, once
the board file requirements has been fixed?
Jakob Engblom, PhD, Technical Marketing Manager
Virtutech?????????????????? Direct: +46 8 690 07 47???
Drottningholmsvägen 22????? Mobile: +46 709 242 646??
11243 Stockholm???????????? Web:??? www.virtutech.com?