This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:08:53PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Plus to a new user the intent of the option is a bit vague.
> > "disassemble-next-line" ? [that has a lot to type to become
> > unambiguous
> Right, I thought about something that begins with "disassemble", but
> didn't want to shoot our completion habits in the foot, since
> currently typing just "disas TAB" is all I need to get disassembly.
I agree we don't want to change that binding (I use it all the time).
But is it a problem? This would be under set, if I understand right.
(Another thing that would be useful, perhaps, is a modifier to 'x/i' to
say "a line's worth of instructions". But I think we'd have a lot of
trouble finding a non-ambiguous command for that.)