This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Move GDB to C++ ?

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Stan Shebs <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:07:14 +0300
Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> <200807101901.m6AJ1UMQ007185@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <488F4AA7.7060001@gnu.org> <g6njvp$2al$1@ger.gmane.org> <ufxpspkwb.fsf@gnu.org> <488F70E6.7060801@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:35:02 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>
> CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> For instance, at this very moment I'm looking at 
> ALL_OBJFILES and friends, wondering if the introduction of multiple 
> execs is going to impact overall performance.

And how would that change with C++?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs

References:
- Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]