This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Move GDB to C++ ?

From: Paul Koning <Paul_Koning at dell dot com>
To: cagney at gnu dot org
Cc: vladimir at codesourcery dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:53:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> <200807101901.m6AJ1UMQ007185@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <48766A88.1050402@earthlink.net> <200807102153.m6ALrjjm017722@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080711062612.GB6132@adacore.com> <g5774i$59h$1@ger.gmane.org> <48776DC1.1070606@gnu.org>

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:

 Andrew> This does, I think, raise an interesting question: is, or
 Andrew> should, be being the a good (best?) C++ debugger be a high
 Andrew> priority for GDB?

Yes.  For one thing, C++ is one of the main languages of GCC (and will
be more so).  And C++ is widely used, and that will increase.

   paul

References:
- Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]