This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Automatic dependency tracking

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:47:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Automatic dependency tracking
References: <200806152203.14626.pedro@codesourcery.com> <u3anel69s.fsf@gnu.org> <20080616012617.GA8944@caradoc.them.org> <g35201$2uf$2@ger.gmane.org> <m33an413yx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080625182858.GA25575@caradoc.them.org> <200806281920.m5SJKAQI008684@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <m3k5g9l5ll.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 01:30:46PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> How does OpenBSD handle this for GCC?
> Or does the OpenBSD gcc maintainer also rewrite the Makefiles?
> 
> Ugh.

I believe OpenBSD is enough versions back on GCC that it is not yet an
issue; I see GCC 3.3.5 in their cvsweb.  GCC documented the
requirement in August 2003; GCC 3.3.0 was released in May 2003.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Automatic dependency tracking
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Automatic dependency tracking
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Automatic dependency tracking
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]