This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Reverse Execution in SID, Reverse Debugging with GDB and SID
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at specifix dot com>
- To: Dave Brolley <brolley at redhat dot com>
- Cc: sid at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:36:40 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] Reverse Execution in SID, Reverse Debugging with GDB and SID
- References: <450EF997.1010601@redhat.com> <4858013F.1090507@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 14:23 -0400, Dave Brolley wrote:
> Micheal Snyder is going to be doing some more work on revserse
> debugging/execution and he reminded me that I never did commit this
> work. It's committed now.
Woo hoo, so now there is at least one target (xstormy16)
where we can actually *test* reverse debugging. Should
be a good step toward committing it to gdb.
> Dave Brolley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patches implement
> >
> > 1) Infrastructure for reverse execution of in SID
> > 2) Target specific implementation for xstormy16
> >
> > This work is intended to be used in conjunction with Michael Snyder's
> > work on reverse debugging in GDB, but I suppose that the idea of
> > executing in reverse need not necessarily be restricted only to this
> > purpose.
> >
> > I'm submitting the general infrastructure work for approval to commit.
> > The xstormy16 specific implementation was done mainly as an example,
> > and perhaps should also be committed.
> >
> > Here is an overview of the changes and how they work:
> >
> > o The changes the the scheduling components are mainly to have them
> > drive the value of 'now' for each scheduled event. Currently they
> > drive the value zero which is not used on the receiving end. This
> > provides a mechanism for a scheduled component to know what 'time'
> > each scheduled event occurs. Components, like memory, which are not
> > scheduled, but which need to know at what 'time' an event occurred can
> > query the scheduler's time attribute to obtain the same information.
> > The scheduler's set_time method has also been updated so that it
> > cancels all pending events. This change was probably already
> > necessary, but the need was exposed during testing of this feature.
> >
> > o A new component class mix-in called reversible_component has been
> > created to consolidate the common needs of a component which may have
> > to step back in 'time'. The main features are a reversible? attribute
> > which tells the component that it should be keeping track of events
> > and a restore-to-time! pin which tells the component to restore it's
> > state to a given 'time'.
> >
> > o A new utility class called change_log has been added to aid those
> > components which choose to implement this using change logging
> > techniques.
> >
> > o The basic_cpu class has been given specific knowledge of what it
> > means to execute in reverse. This is controlled by it's new
> > exec-direction attribute which can be set to "forward" or "backward".
> > This attribute is checked when the step-insns pin is driven. If the
> > direction is forward, then it's business as usual. If it's backward,
> > then the cpu does what is necessary to step backward and then resets
> > the scheduler to that 'time'. The scheduler in turn drives its
> > time-set pin to notify other components in the system to restore
> > themselves to that 'time'. Note that reverse execution need not be one
> > insn at a time. I did this for the xstormy16 example so that stepi
> > would work in reverse with gdb. Note that in the xstormy16 example,
> > breakpoints and watchpoints are also supported while executing in
> > reverse.
> >
> > The idea is that components in the system which have state implement
> > some method of restoring their state to what it was at a given 'time'.
> > Whatever makes the most sense for each particular component. The cpu
> > is an obvious example as is memory. More complex systems may have
> > other components with this requirement. For the xstormy16, cpu and
> > memory are the only components requiring this capability.
> >
> > In particular, the xstormy16 cpu component needed only to track
> > changes in the pc and the gr registers. Using specific knowlege of the
> > kinds of changes that are possible to the pc, in particular I was able
> > to implement a change logging system that uses only 1 byte for small
> > pc changes (i.e. less than 128 bytes) and 3 bytes otherwise. Similarly
> > for the gr registers, a 2 byte mask indicates which registers have
> > changed and then only the changed registers are added to the change
> > log record. Many change log records are therefore 5 bytes or less.
> >
> > One interesting 'feature' of the current implementation is that if a
> > program has been debugged to completion and then debugging has started
> > again (i.e. the gdb 'target' command establishes a new connection with
> > SID), one can debug backward past the beginning of the program (with a
> > warning from SID) and back into the previous execution instance. The
> > feature is handy in the case that you use the GDB continue command and
> > end up at the end of the program by mistake.
> >
> > Comments, ideas, and, of course, approval to commit the infrastructure
> > patch please. I can also commit the xstormy16 specific parts if desired.
> >
> > Dave
> >