This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints

From: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi at cox dot net>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:09:17 +1200
Subject: Re: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints
References: <200804262208.50476.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20080426194843.GA13338@brasko.net> <18451.43604.348956.734019@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200804270222.50020.vladimir@codesourcery.com>

 > >  > The only case I can think that would be nice is something like,
 > >  >   -break-disable -all
 > > 
 > > -break-disable with no argument will already do this as it just executes
 > > the CLI command "disable".
 > 
 > Which is not guaranteed to be the case in future. That's why I'm trying to
 > figure what is desired behaviour is.

Leave it as it is?  It doesn't really bother me as these commands don't
create any output and Emacs needs to work with the CLI commands in the GUD
buffer anyway.  

I think more important than the input syntax is some kind of output as I
suggested in:

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-04/msg00377.html

And it should work with CLI  commands too, i.e., through event notification.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob

References:
- [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints
  - From: Nick Roberts
- Re: [MI] -break-delete with several breakpoints
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]